Are you looking for an item finder that works with Google’s Find My Device app or Apple Find My, but aren’t sure which one to get?

Both Chipolo POP trackers and Pebblebee tags work with the Apple Find My or Google’s Find My Device network, so many of their features are similar or work basically the same. However, there are some key differences between the two brands and their products.

Here’s a short breakdown that might help you decide.

To help you decide, here is a comparison of some of the most popular product features Chipolo POP and Pebblebee finders offer.

Colors

Color is a significant distinction between the two products. Pebblebee offers only a black option, while Chipolo POP finders boast a selection of six colors: black, white, blue, red, yellow, and green. For those who value color choice, this could be the deciding factor.
 

Design

Chipolo trackers prioritize clean lines and subtle design, enhanced by vibrant colors. That might be an additional help when organizing your items (you can color code or color match your belongings). Plus, the vibrant colors help you notice hidden objects faster.

Pebblebee finders feature a more pronounced aesthetic, appealing to users who prefer their tracker to have a more tech-inspired look.

Extra features

Both Pebblebee and Chipolo integrate with either Apple Find My or Google's Find My Device, meaning they share the core features of these native apps. However, each brand also provides additional functionalities through their own companion apps, available on the Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Chipolo offers a Call Your Phone feature, allowing users to locate their phone by double-pressing the tracker. Similarly, Pebblebee's app includes a Phone Finder feature that works with a double tap.

Beyond this, Chipolo provides even more extras like customizable ringtones, a remote camera shutter function, and Out of Range Alerts for Android users (a feature already integrated into the Find My app for iPhone users).
 

Price

Pebblebee is slightly more expensive than Chipolo. While exact prices may vary by market, Chipolo typically costs around $29 or 34 €, compared to Pebblebee's $34 or 37 €.

This price difference becomes more noticeable when purchasing multiple trackers. For instance, a Chipolo POP 4-pack costs around $89 or 105 €, whereas a Pebblebee 4-pack is approximately Sale price$120 or 130 €.

For larger quantities, such as a 6-pack, Chipolo offers a significantly better value, with individual trackers priced at around $20 or 25 €.

Origin

Chipolo, a pioneer in the Bluetooth tracker market and a leading brand since its 2014 Kickstarter launch, was closely followed by Pebblebee, which entered the market in 2015.

Based in Trbovlje, Slovenia, Chipolo proudly designs and manufactures all its products in Europe, at their headquarters. In contrast, Pebblebee is a US company located in Seattle, Washington, while their products are manufactured in China.

Demonstrating a commitment to sustainability, Chipolo's latest products now incorporate at least 50% recycled materials, while their packaging is now paper-only and is FSC-certified.

Mission and values

Over the last decade, both Pebblebee and Chipolo have been committed to developing and improving their solutions for locating personal items.

While Pebblebee largely focuses on the technical aspects and practical utility of their products, Chipolo not only delivers effective tracking solutions but also actively communicates its values. Their mission centers around freeing people from the anxiety of lost belongings, encouraging them to engage with the world and create lasting memories. 

Built on a foundation of friendship, they emphasize treating their community with respect. Chipolo also prioritizes genuine environmental solutions over superficial trends, reflecting their care for the planet.

Both brands deliver dependable trackers that effectively help you locate your keys, bags, luggage, and other items you want to keep safe. Therefore, you can't make a truly wrong decision. The final choice rests on your personal aesthetic, specific functional needs, the importance of sustainability, and overall preferences.